F. Gardiner’s Article “Why We Must Change: The Research Evidence” raises a number of very important questions concerning modern college education system.As an LVN program, we provide education to adults with at least high school level of knowledge, and therefore, the level equivalent to college level. In fact, being a degree-granting LVN program, we consider our LVN school as college-level institution. And teaching at this level, we must bring up the appropriate questions about reaching out and getting through to our Nursing students. Do they learn what we teach them?
Apparently, based on the most recent research completed at multiple universities and colleges on teaching techniques, methods of information delivery, and students’ retention of information, how we teach is not necessarily is how the students learn.
In particular, many teachers employ the method of delivery that requires mere memorization and regurgitation of information. The larger the class size, the less thinking is expected and required of the students, and the more simple recall of information taught. The studies show that students in classes of medium size (20-45 students) are more oriented toward comprehension of the material, and in the small classes (15 students or fewer) the students were able to analyze and integrate the information taught.
Moreover, a very small percent of undergraduate students (only 14%) were ever taught how to study. And when later surveyed on course material retention, in the best cases it was only up to 50%, and in most cases it was as low at 20% of the material taught. So, only one fifth of what we teach, spend so much time and effort on, is retained by our students. Clearly, something needs to change in our education system.If the students retain only one fifth of the lecture, what happens to the rest of the information given to them over the time frame of a course? And why are the retention rates so low?
The answer is simple: the students are not thinking during lecture. What are they doing during lecture, if not thinking? Only about fifty percent of the lecture they are asking or answering questions, or taking notes, the rest of the time, their attention drifts. In fact, science shows that if the student does not stay involved, actively participating in the process of learning, their attention wanders off the subject within 10-15 minutes of the beginning of the lecture, and up to 15 % of the lecture time is spent in day-dreaming!
So, how do we improve the education system for our LVN students? to improve LVN certification. Do we need to change the course curricula or change methods of presentation? Maybe so. However, it is absolutely vital to the process to do everything to retain the attention of the students by keeping them involved in the learning process. Learning is effective only when it is active. The information will be retained, only when thoroughly understood, and it will be understood only if the students come to discover that information on their own.